Skip to content 
When Government Negligence Causes Your Injury: What You Need to Know
A public property injury attorney specializes in helping victims seek compensation when injured on government-owned land due to unsafe conditions. These cases differ significantly from private property claims due to sovereign immunity, strict filing deadlines, and higher standards of proof.
Key Differences When Suing Government Entities:
- Strict Notice Deadlines – As little as 6 months to 1 year (vs. 2 years for private claims)
- Higher Negligence Standard – Often requires proving “gross negligence,” not just ordinary negligence
- Damage Caps – Maximum recovery limits may apply to government claims
- Complex Procedures – Formal notice requirements and specific forms must be filed correctly
- Sovereign Immunity – Government entities have legal protections that must be overcome
You’ve slipped on an icy sidewalk the city failed to clear. Or maybe you tripped on a broken stairway at a public building. Perhaps your child was hurt on poorly maintained playground equipment at a municipal park.
When you’re injured on public property, figuring out who’s responsible feels overwhelming. The government entity that owns the property—whether it’s a city, county, or state—has legal obligations to keep visitors safe. But they also have powerful legal protections that make these claims much more complex than suing a private property owner.
The clock starts ticking the moment you’re injured. In Pennsylvania, you may have as little as six months to file formal notice with the government entity. Miss that deadline, and you could lose your right to compensation entirely—regardless of how severe your injuries are or how clearly negligent the government was.
I’m Jason Fine, and over my 25 years representing injury victims across Pennsylvania, I’ve successfully recovered compensation for clients hurt on public property, including navigating the complex bureaucracy involved when a public property injury attorney must hold government entities accountable. Our team understands exactly how to meet the strict deadlines and evidence requirements these cases demand.
Navigating Your Claim with a Public Property Injury Attorney
When you’re injured on public property, you’re not just dealing with physical pain and medical bills—you’re facing a legal maze that’s fundamentally different from any other personal injury case. The government entities responsible for these properties have layers of protection that private property owners simply don’t have. That’s where a public property injury attorney becomes essential.
Our role is to cut through the bureaucracy, meet the impossibly tight deadlines, and build a case strong enough to overcome the government’s built-in advantages. We’ve been doing this for 25 years, and we know exactly what it takes to hold government entities accountable when their negligence causes harm.
What Constitutes Public Property and Who is Responsible?
Let’s start with the basics: what exactly counts as “public property” in legal terms? It’s any land or facility owned and maintained by a government entity—federal, state, or local. These are the spaces we all use every day, often without giving them a second thought.
Public property includes:
- Government buildings like post offices, courthouses, libraries, and municipal offices
- Public parks and recreation areas including playgrounds, walking trails, sports fields, and swimming pools
- Public transportation infrastructure such as bus stops, train stations, and airports
- Roads, sidewalks, bridges, and pedestrian walkways
- Public schools and universities
- Public hospitals and health facilities
Now, here’s an important distinction: just because the public can access a place doesn’t make it public property. A shopping mall or commercial plaza might feel “public” because anyone can walk in, but it’s privately owned. That matters because the liability rules are completely different. While private property owners must keep visitors reasonably safe, how you pursue a claim depends entirely on whether that occupier is a government entity or a private owner.
The government’s duty of care is straightforward in principle: if they invite the public onto their property, they must take reasonable steps to prevent harm. This means regularly inspecting for hazards, repairing dangerous conditions promptly, posting adequate warnings for non-obvious dangers, and maintaining infrastructure to safe standards.
When government entities fail in this duty, injuries happen. Slip and fall accidents are among the most common—think icy sidewalks the city failed to clear, uneven pavement, wet floors in public buildings, or debris left in walkways. We also see trip and fall injuries from broken stairs, cracked sidewalks, and potholes that should have been repaired months ago.
Playground accidents are particularly heartbreaking. Faulty equipment, inadequate surfacing, or poor maintenance can lead to serious injuries for children. We’ve also handled cases involving falling objects from deteriorating buildings, poor lighting that creates hazardous conditions, and inadequate security in public spaces.
The question after any of these incidents is always the same: who’s responsible? When it’s public property, the answer points to the government entity tasked with maintaining it. But getting them to accept that responsibility? That’s where the real challenge begins.
The Challenge of Sovereign Immunity and Strict Deadlines
Here’s where things get complicated—and why you need a public property injury attorney who knows this terrain inside and out.
Unlike suing a private business or individual, suing the government means confronting a legal doctrine called sovereign immunity. Historically, this meant you couldn’t sue the government at all unless it gave you permission. The reasoning? “The king can do no wrong.” While we’ve moved past absolute immunity, government entities still enjoy significant legal protections that don’t apply to anyone else.
To address this, most jurisdictions have enacted Tort Claims Acts—laws that specify exactly when and how you can sue the government. Pennsylvania has the Pennsylvania Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act for local governments. New Jersey has the New Jersey Tort Claims Act. These laws create narrow windows of opportunity for victims, and they come with strict procedural requirements that can trap the unwary.
The most critical—and most dangerous—aspect of these laws is the notice of claim requirement. This isn’t the lawsuit itself; it’s a formal written notification to the government entity that you intend to file a claim. And the deadlines are shockingly short.
Consider these real examples from our service areas: In New Jersey, you have just 90 days to file a formal notice of claim. In Pennsylvania, the deadline is six months. In Delaware, you must file notice with the mayor within one year. These deadlines are strict and unforgiving.
Compare this to the typical two-year statute of limitations for private personal injury cases, and you can see how easy it is to lose your rights entirely simply by not knowing about these deadlines.
| Feature | Government Entity Claims | Private Property Owner Claims |
|---|---|---|
| Immunity Protection | Protected by sovereign immunity; can only be sued under specific conditions outlined in Tort Claims Acts | No immunity protection; standard negligence laws apply |
| Filing Deadlines | Extremely short notice periods (as little as 90 days to 1 year in many states) | Typically 2 years under standard statute of limitations |
| Damage Caps | Often subject to maximum recovery limits set by statute | Generally no caps (except in specific cases like medical malpractice) |
| Proof Standard | May require proving “gross negligence” rather than ordinary negligence; higher burden of proof | Standard negligence (duty, breach, causation, damages) |
Missing these deadlines means losing your case before it even starts—no matter how severe your injuries or how clearly negligent the government was. That’s why contacting an experienced attorney immediately after an injury on public property isn’t just important; protecting your rights.
Proving Negligence and Recovering Damages
Even after you’ve steerd the notice requirements and established that sovereign immunity doesn’t bar your claim, you still face the challenge of proving negligence. In public property cases, this often means meeting a higher standard than you would against a private defendant.
To prove negligence, you must establish four elements: the government entity owed you a duty of care, they breached that duty through action or inaction, their breach caused your injury, and you suffered damages as a result. Some jurisdictions require you to prove “gross negligence”—a much higher bar that means more than mere carelessness or failure to act reasonably. It requires showing reckless disregard for safety.
When we build these cases, we’re looking at whether the government knew or should have known about the dangerous condition, how long it existed before your injury, whether they had adequate inspection and maintenance procedures in place, and whether they took reasonable steps to warn visitors or fix the problem.
The damages you can recover include medical bills (both past and future), lost wages and loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering, and in some cases, property damage.
However, many Tort Claims Acts impose damage caps—maximum amounts you can recover regardless of the severity of your injuries. This is another way government entities are protected differently than private defendants.
Why You Need an Experienced Public Property Injury Attorney
By now, you can see why these cases require specialized knowledge and experience. The procedural minefield, the compressed timelines, the sovereign immunity protections, the higher burden of proof—every aspect of a public property injury claim is more complex than a standard premises liability case.
A public property injury attorney knows how to steer the bureaucracy. We know how to quickly investigate property ownership (which isn’t always obvious), identify the correct government entity to notify, and ensure notices are filed properly and on time. We understand how to gather the specific evidence needed to overcome higher negligence standards—maintenance records, inspection logs, prior complaints, and documentation of how long hazardous conditions existed.
We also know how to negotiate with government lawyers who are skilled at defending these claims and who have the resources of entire legal departments behind them. It’s not a level playing field, but with experienced counsel, you can protect your rights and pursue the compensation you deserve.
At J. Fine Law, we’ve been holding government entities accountable for 25 years. We know these cases inside and out, and we move quickly to protect our clients’ rights from day one. Learn more about Pennsylvania Premises Liability Lawyer claims or contact us today for a free case evaluation. When you’re up against the government, you need an attorney who knows how to win.